| ID | 168423 |
| Title Proper | Oversecuritization of global health |
| Other Title Information | changing the terms of debate |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wenham, Clare |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Linking health and security has become a mainstream approach to health policy issues over the past two decades. So much so that the discourse of global health security has become close to synonymous with global health, their meanings being considered almost interchangeable. While the debates surrounding the health–security nexus vary in levels of analysis from the global to the national to the individual, this article argues that the consideration of health as a security issue, and the ensuing path dependencies, have shifted in three ways. First, the concept has been broadened to the extent that a multitude of health issues (and others) are constructed as threats to health security. Second, securitizing health has moved beyond a rhetorical device to include the direct involvement of the security sector. Third, the performance of health security has become a security threat in itself. These considerations, the article argues, alter the remit of the global health security narrative; the global health community needs to recognize this shift and adapt its use of security-focused policies accordingly. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 95, No.5; Sep 2019: p.1093–1110 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 95 No 5 |
| Key Words | Global Health ; Global Health and Development |