| ID | 168531 |
| Title Proper | Party or the Purse? Unequal Representation in the US Senate |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | LAX, JEFFREY R |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Recent work on US policymaking argues that responsiveness to public opinion is distorted by money, in that the preferences of the rich matter much more than those of lower-income Americans. A second distortion—partisan biases in responsiveness—has been less well studied and is often ignored or downplayed in the literature on affluent influence. We are the first to evaluate, in tandem, these two potential distortions in representation. We do so using 49 Senate roll-call votes from 2001 to 2015. We find that affluent influence is overstated and itself contingent on partisanship—party trumps the purse when senators have to take sides. The poor get what they want more often from Democrats. The rich get what they want more often from Republicans, but only if Republican constituents side with the rich. Thus, partisanship induces, shapes, and constrains affluent influence. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 113, No.4; Nov 2019: p.917-940 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review 2019-12 113, 4 |
| Key Words | US Senate ; Unequal Representation |