Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1602Hits:19169529Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID168553
Title ProperPower Sharing and the Rule of Law in the Aftermath of Civil War
LanguageENG
AuthorHoddie, Matthew ;  Hartzell, Caroline A ;  Caroline A Hartzell, Matthew Hoddie
Summary / Abstract (Note)What effect do power-sharing institutions agreed to as part of civil war settlements have on the development of the rule of law in post–civil war states? We contend that power-sharing measures facilitate the emergence of the rule of law in two ways. First, they establish a form of institutional constraint that promotes judicial autonomy and independence. Second, they foster a sense of security among judges and other political actors that bolsters commitment to the law. We demonstrate the plausibility of a positive relationship between power sharing and the rule of law through an analysis of post–civil war states between the years 1948 and 2006. Our findings suggest that civil war settlements can help to establish the rule of law when they include mechanisms aimed at allaying the insecurities of political actors in the postconflict environment.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 63, No.3; Sep 2019: p.641–653
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol: 63 No 3
Key WordsRule of Law ;  Power Sharing ;  Civil War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text