Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:763Hits:19988957Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID168887
Title ProperChanging the Conversation in Washington? An Illustrative Case Study of President Trump’s Air Strikes on Syria, 2017
LanguageENG
AuthorBlomdahl, Mikael
Summary / Abstract (Note)This analysis uses case study methodology to further the understanding of the diversionary theory of war in specific cases. It employs a model consisting of five propositions that build upon existing qualitative research on diversionary war theory. The synthesised framework examines one possible case of American diversionary military actions: President Donald Trump´s decision to launch missile strikes against Syrian airfields on 7 April 2017. The study tests the descriptive accuracy and further develops the diversionary theory of war, in essence, generally suggesting that empirical support for the diversionary logic in this case is mixed.
`In' analytical NoteDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 30, No.3; Sep 2019: p.536-555
Journal SourceDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol: 30 No 3
Key WordsTrump ;  2017 ;  Conversation in Washington ;  Air Strikes on Syria


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text