Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:511Hits:20409638Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID170009
Title ProperOne Dyadic Peace Leads to Another? Conflict Systems, Terminations, and Net Reduction in Fighting Groups
LanguageENG
AuthorJoshi, Madhav ;  Melander, Erik ;  Quinn, Jason
Summary / Abstract (Note)Governments often fight multiple civil conflicts simultaneously and each conflict can have multiple groups. Prior research on civil war termination and recurrence has been conducted at either the conflict level, once all the groups have been terminated, or the dyadic level, which examines group terminations in a conflict separately as more or less independent processes. Hence, conflict-level studies mostly tell us how to preserve peace once a civil war has already ended, while dyadic studies mostly tell us about the durability of specific group-level terminations within the larger process that led to that ending. As a result, our understanding of how ongoing civil wars are brought to a close is limited, particularly, with respect to multiparty conflicts. In this study, we put forth a systems approach that treats dyadic terminations as connected processes where group terminations influence the future behavior of other groups, incentivizing the system toward greater aggregate peace or conflict. Analyzing 264 dyadic terminations, the findings suggest that the most effective strategy for governments to reduce systemic conflict is to demonstrate to other groups that they have the political will and capacity to implement security, political, and social reforms as part of a larger reform-oriented peace process. Viable implementation can be followed by the concomitant use of military victories against remaining groups with great success. However, military victories achieved in isolation, that is, outside of a reform-process, do not reduce future levels of conflict even if they themselves are durable.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 63, No.4; Dec 2019: p. 863–875
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol: 63 No 4
Key WordsConflict Systems ;  Fighting Groups


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text