| ID | 170034 |
| Title Proper | Lost in Misconceptions about Social Identity Theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Larson, Deborah Welch ; Shevchenko, Alexei ; Deborah Welch Larson, Alexei Shevchenko |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Dissatisfied with their relative standing in the world, China and Russia are challenging the US-dominated liberal order. Could US accommodation of their status concerns reduce conflict? The psychological rationale for status accommodation is rooted in the insights of social identity theory (SIT), which argues that persistent status denial leads lower-status groups to “lash out.” Steven Ward (2017) objects that political scientists have misinterpreted SIT. In his view, impermeable group boundaries only affect individuals and do not lead to intergroup conflict. Ward's narrow critique overlooks the larger meaning and significance of SIT, which is about how frustration and anger over status barriers and unfair treatment motivate lower-status groups to challenge the status quo. Social competition is positional and zero-sum. Given the insights of SIT, Ward's recommendation that the United States demonstrate to China and Russia the futility of status competition is likely to provoke a backlash and increase the risk of military conflict. Instead, SIT implies a continuing process of status accommodation and efforts to maintain the legitimacy and stability of US leadership. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Quarterly Vol. 63, No.4; Dec 2019: p. 1189–1191 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Quarterly Vol: 63 No 4 |
| Key Words | Social Identity Theory ; Misconceptions |