Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:641Hits:20305148Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID170260
Title ProperRohingya jurisdiction decision
Other Title Informationa step forward for stopping forced deportations
LanguageENG
AuthorOrchard, Phil ;  Colvin, Victoria
Summary / Abstract (Note)The International Criminal Court Pre-Trial Chamber’s decision that the Rohingya situation falls within the Rome Statute and can therefore be investigated by the Prosecutor may – on the face of it – not appear to be a significant milestone in achieving accountability against the government of Myanmar and its military, the Tatmadaw. While the Prosecutor has now confirmed that a preliminary examination will be opened examining the deportation of the Rohingya (International Criminal Court 2018c), this will be a slow process. The likelihood of any member of the Myanmar government actually being tried and convicted is low. We suggest, however, that its effects will be broader than just the Rohingya situation for two reasons. The first is that it in effect creates a new referral mechanism for situations of forced deportation. The second is because it helps to both clarify and highlight the international crimes of forced deportation and forcible transfer, which may lead to their prosecution on a more routine basis.
`In' analytical NoteAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 73, No.1; Feb 2019: p.16-21
Journal SourceAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 73 No 1
Key WordsRohingya Jurisdiction Decision


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text