| ID | 170405 |
| Title Proper | In defence of Australian foreign policy |
| Other Title Information | common themes, assumptions, and challenges |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Baldino, Daniel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | While interrelated issues and challenges can only expand, the study of foreign policy in Australia is not a very healthy discipline. While not wholly wedged on life-support, there are genuine grounds for concern about the decline of Australian foreign policy (AFP) as a subject for serious academic concentration and its position as a marginalised topic of analysis. Unfortunately, attempts to reinvigorate the field continue to contend with a number of ingrained biases. AFP can be incorrectly dismissed as muddled and marginal while major debate points in the field are often glibly portrayed as broadly settled. This is despite the that fact that it can provide unique insights into policy-making in the twenty-first century while teaching students the benefits of problem-solving through a multi-disciplinary lens. Additionally, there is an ever-changing, contested set of knowledge that future leaders will need to consider in order to be successful, critical thinkers in a multi-agency environment. This will continue to incorporate an evolving variety of significant issues that constitute both conventional and unconventional threats to national interests. |
| `In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 73, No.6; Dec 2019: p.508-512 |
| Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 73 No 6 |
| Key Words | Political Science ; Teaching ; Curriculum Design ; Australia, Foreign Policy |