Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:615Hits:19966400Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID170977
Title ProperManaging Small Allies Amidst Patron–Adversary Rapprochement
Other Title Informationa Tale of Two Koreas
LanguageENG
AuthorWong, Audrye
Summary / Abstract (Note)What explains variation in how a patron manages its existing alliance with a client state when improving relations with an adversary? I theorize that the patron’s alliance management strategy is influenced by the client’s degree of bargaining power over its patron. Bargaining power derives from the availability of an outside option. Using archival and interview evidence, I show variation in alliance bargaining dynamics during US–China rapprochement. While the United States was dismissive toward South Korea, China was highly placating toward North Korea, making concessions and providing compensation. However, China became more dismissive during Sino-South Korean normalization, when North Korea’s bargaining power decreased. The findings have important policy implications for understanding how a patron could simultaneously manage alliance and adversary relationships.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Security Vol. 16, No.1; Jan-Apr 2020: p.107-126
Journal SourceAsian Security Vol: 16 No 1
Key WordsUnited States ;  China ;  Korea ;  North Korea ;  South Korea ;  Adversary Reapprochment


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text