| ID | 171022 |
| Title Proper | Failing to fulfil the responsibility to protect |
| Other Title Information | the war on drugs as crimes against humanity in the Philippines |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gallagher, Adrian ; Raffle, Euan ; Maulana, Zain |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The article provides the first substantive analysis of the war on drugs in the Philippines under the Responsibility to Protect. It develops in two stages. First, it argues that the war on drugs constitutes crimes against humanity through an analysis of, (i) extrajudicial killings and vigilante justice, (ii), dehumanisation, and, (iii) the exaggeration of threat. Second, it examines the response of the permanent five members of the UN Security Council (p5) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Despite that the US, the UK, and France have expressed public concerns, we show that they prioritise counter-terrorism and trade over the Responsibility to Protect. Meanwhile, China and Russia uphold the view that the war on drugs is a matter of domestic jurisdiction. Regarding ASEAN, we draw on 26 semi-structured elite interviews conducted in South East Asia (2016-2018) to evidence that the elites prioritise state sovereignty and non-interference. The outcome is that there is a significant protection deficit as the government of the Philippines, the p5, and ASEAN are failing to protect those targeted in the war on drugs. We hope that the article will act as a catalyst for a much needed conversation on the international community’s political, legal, and moral responsibilities regarding mass violence against drug users in international relations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 33, No.2; Mar 2020; p 247-277 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 33 No 2 |
| Key Words | ASEAN ; Association of Southeast Asian Nations ; Philippines ; Crimes Against Humanity ; War on Drugs ; International Relations ; Permanent Five |