| ID | 171932 |
| Title Proper | Transcending binaries in critical peacebuilding scholarship to address ‘inclusivity’ projects |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Danielsson, Anna |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In light of the recent turn to ‘inclusivity’ in peacebuilding practice, this article problematises established ways of ‘doing critique’ in peacebuilding scholarship. Inclusivity refers to the building of peace as a situated and co-constituted process. This entails what can be termed a new epistemic commitment: the acknowledgement that peacebuilding as a dynamic and emergent phenomenon is also an epistemically co-constituted process. In the article, I make two arguments. First, the move towards inclusivity places currently dominant modes of scholarly critique at an impasse. Persistent ontological and epistemological binaries preclude a productive investigation and challenging of inclusivity projects and their epistemic commitment. Second, I argue that, by returning to historical conditions that were formative in the very emergence of the category of ‘the local’, the conceptual basis of an alternative mode of critique (re)appears. This alternative critical project allows for an analytical sensibility to peacebuilding as emergent and adaptive. It makes it possible to disentangle power relations as these emerge between different and possibly unexpected configurations of actors and knowledge claims in inclusivity projects |
| `In' analytical Note | Third World Quarterly Vol. 41, No.7; 2020: p. 1085-1102 |
| Journal Source | Third World Quarterly Vol: 41 No, 7 |
| Key Words | Peacebuilding ; Critique ; Situated Knowledge ; Inclusivity ; Politics of Intervention |