Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:390Hits:19927146Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID171988
Title ProperEthnic conflict and the limits of nonviolent resistance
LanguageENG
AuthorPischedda, Costantino
Summary / Abstract (Note)Recent research shows that campaigns of nonviolent resistance are much more successful in producing radical political change than armed rebellion. I argue that the study of nonviolent resistance has paid insufficient attention to a key condition for success—a shared ethnic identity between challengers and government. When challengers and incumbent belong to different ethnic groups, the prospects of campaign success are drastically curtailed, as this situation of “ethnic conflict” inhibits the mechanisms through which nonviolent resistance enables success: emergence of a critical mass of challengers, defection of segments of the security apparatus and the regime inner circle, and development of feelings of sympathy for the opposition cause among key government decision makers. Statistical analysis of all nonviolent campaigns from 1945 to 2006 supports my argument. Nonviolent ethnic campaigns are significantly and substantially less likely to succeed and draw both fewer participants and government defectors than their nonethnic counterparts.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 29, No.2; Apr-May 2020: p.362-391
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 29 No 2
Key WordsEthnic Conflict ;  Government ;  Ethnic Identity ;  Nonviolent Resistance ;  Nonviolent Ethnic Campaigns


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text