Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:404Hits:20517435Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID172142
Title ProperNATO at 70
Other Title Informationpledges, free riding, and benefit-burden concordance
LanguageENG
AuthorSandler, Todd ;  Kim, Wukki
Summary / Abstract (Note)For 2011–2017, this paper revisits NATO burden sharing in light of recent developments and pledges to bolster members’ defense shares of GDP to 2%. Russian nationalism, enhanced transnational terrorism, and intrastate conflicts are apt to increase the publicness of NATO defense spending over the last eight years. When NATO allies’ defense shares of GDP are correlated with their GDP ranks, there is clear evidence of the exploitation of the large, rich allies by the small, poor allies, indicative of allies sharing purely public defense spending since 2011. Such exploitation and free riding has rarely been seen after 1967. In addition, there is an absence of concordance between NATO allies’ defense burdens and their derived benefit shares, consistent with greater defense publicness. Finally, we find further proof of exploitation and free riding for a broad-based measure of security spending.
`In' analytical NoteDefence and Peace Economics Vol. 31, No.4; Jun 2020: p.400-413
Journal SourceDefence and Peace Economics Vol: 31 No 4
Key WordsFree Riding ;  Exploitation Hypothesis ;  Joint Product Model of Alliances ;  Benefit - Burden Concordance ;  NATO Burden Sharing


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text