Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:435Hits:19941380Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID173134
Title ProperJumping on the Bandwagon
Other Title InformationDifferentiation and Security Defection during Conflict
LanguageENG
AuthorDworschak, Christoph
Summary / Abstract (Note)When confronted with mass uprisings, governments deploy their security forces for crowd control or repression. However, sometimes security agencies choose to side with the opposition movement. Recent work shows that “fragmentation” contributes to defection: fragmenting the security forces into parallel units leads to oversight problems and grievances among soldiers, which raises the risk of members of the security forces defecting to the opposition movement. However, I argue that the effect on defection is strongly moderated by the circumstances under which states choose to fragment their military: fragmentation for the purpose of security specialization, called “differentiation,” even decreases its risk. Employing Bayesian multilevel modeling, the findings corroborate this distinction. The study contributes to the fundamental discussion on civil–military relations, shedding light on why some conflict situations see security defections while others do not. Understanding this phenomenon is a pivotal element to explaining how conflicts develop, escalate, and end.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 64, No.7-8; Aug-Sep 2020: p.1335-1357
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 64 No 7-8
Key WordsMilitary Effectiveness ;  Civil–Military Relations ;  Fragmentation ;  Defection


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text