| ID | 173227 |
| Title Proper | Analysis on the Legal Nature of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pak, Hui-Chol ; Son, Hye-Ryon ; Jong, Son-Kyong |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | At present, some states are undertaking military interventions in different parts of the world, contending the ‘legitimacy’ of their i006Evocation of responsibility to protect civilians from a humanitarian crisis. Discussions at international forums concerning the concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) are inconclusive about its legal nature and application. While some scholars and states support the doctrine of R2P as being legitimate, others challenge or take a rather sceptical view. Divergent views seem to be originating from its incompatibilities with the rules of international law, including the Charter of the United Nations. What is controversial is that the supporters of R2P are mainly from the West, while objections to R2P are from developing countries mainly from West Asia or Africa. This raises concerns about the possibility of future applications of R2P in any of the countries in these regions or other developing countries. The article, analyses the legal nature of R2P in terms of the main principles of international law and other sources of international law and argues that the legitimacy and international legal effect of R2P are uncertain. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Vol. 57, No.3; Jul 2020: p.279-295 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Vol: 57 No 3 |
| Key Words | Humanitarian Intervention ; Libya ; Un Security Council ; Legitimacy ; Responsibility to Protect ; R2P |