| ID | 173228 |
| Title Proper | Indian Perspectives on the ‘Responsibility to Protect' |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Singh, Akanksha |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The concept of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P) took shape to refine the contested concept of ‘humanitarian intervention’. In the initial phase, the concept of R2P did not receive enthusiastic endorsement. Developing countries including India perceived it as a new body with the old spirit and likened it with the concept of humanitarian intervention, and this was reinforced by the US-led war against Iraq in 2003. However, the 2005 World Summit proved to be a watershed in the evolution of R2P, just as it is a landmark to understand an important phase of India’s approach to the idea. It would not be accurate to characterize India as a determined nay-sayer on R2P endorsement, particularly in view of the widely known priority India attached at the World Summit to the question of United Nations (UN) Security Council enlargement. Eventually, by 2009 (with the introduction of ‘three- pillar principles’ of R2P), India became a major proponent for the cautious and legitimate implementation of R2P. However, the experiences gained from Libya made India become a voice of caution in invoking forcible options under the R2P principle in Syria. In this article, the attempt has been made to articulate various permutations and combinations regarding India’s evolving approach to R2P on a case-by-case basis |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Vol. 57, No.3; Jul 2020: p.296-316 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Vol: 57 No 3 |
| Key Words | Humanitarian Intervention ; World Summit ; Responsibility to Protect ; United Nations ; Responsibility While Protecting ; Three-Pillar Principle |