| ID | 173466 |
| Title Proper | How Fair is Patent Litigation in China? Evidence from the Beijing Courts |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Chenguo Zhang (a1) and Jin Cao ; Zhang, Chenguo ; Cao,Jin |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | By conducting field research and analysing judgments delivered in Beijing courts from 2004 to 2011, we find that the popular notion held by China's trade partners of the inadequacy of intellectual property protection is only partly supported by the empirical evidence. The likelihood of winning lawsuits is higher for foreign than domestic plaintiffs and the extremely low damages ruled by Chinese courts are due to particular causes. Courts lack consistent methods to calculate incurred losses in intellectual property right (IPR) infringements and consequently routinely apply the statutory damages whose upper limit is restricted by legislation. Efforts by Chinese legislators to enhance compensation by lifting the upper limit of awardable statutory damages in the Third Amendment of Chinese Patent Law (2008) did not seem to have an effect on our sample. Chinese policymakers should instead focus on the cause of the issue by providing more implementable guidelines for courts to calculate losses. Courts need to develop applicable conventions for calculating damages, based on objective criteria of how much compensation ought to be payable, which is also the basis of calculating reasonable statutory damages. Thus, the new provision of the “right of information” on pirated goods proposed by the ongoing Fourth Amendment provides a significant weapon to combat counterfeiting. |
| `In' analytical Note | China Quarterly, No.241; Mar 2020: p.247-261 |
| Journal Source | China Quarterly No 241 |
| Key Words | Trade War ; Discrimination ; Intellectual Property Protection ; Damage ; Patent Litigation ; Beijing Courtsin ; Adequate Enforcement |