Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:828Hits:19990342Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID173735
Title ProperWhat do Islamists bring to the negotiation table? religion and the case of the Pakistani Taliban
LanguageENG
AuthorSheikh, Mona Kanwal
Summary / Abstract (Note)Is religion the main reason why negotiations with Islamists fail? Contemporary international relations literature views compromise over religious claims as being particularly difficult compared to other types of claims. Religious conflicts are understood as unique phenomena. Do religious factors explain why successful conflict resolution attempts with Islamists are more difficult to achieve than with other insurgent groups who pursue non-religious claims? This article examines the case of the Pakistani Taliban and the types of demands they have made during peace talks and in their communications. The role of religion is examined in this article and, specifically, theories of scarce resources, indivisibility and securitization are analyzed to explain the difficulties of negotiating with Islamists.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Negotiation Vol. 25, No.3; 2020: p.413–434
Journal SourceInternational Negotiation Vol: 25 No 3
Key WordsDiplomacy ;  Religion ;  Negotiations ;  Religious Conflict ;  Religious Violence ;  Pakistani Taliban


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text