| ID | 173737 |
| Title Proper | Failed negotiations and the dark side of ripeness |
| Other Title Information | insights from Egypt |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Matesan, Ioana Emy |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article revisits ripeness theory and examines whether conflicts with armed Islamist groups can also be ripe for negotiation. The article argues that armed Islamist organizations can be willing to negotiate and demobilize, but talks are particularly vulnerable to spoilers and public backlash. To examine these dynamics, the article investigates the case of al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya in Egypt. Relying on a variety of primary and secondary sources, including organizational documents and testimonies by the leaders, the analysis shows that the absence of ripeness can indeed explain some of the failures of negotiations. However, when the conflict was finally ripe, talks broke down because of elite divisions and public backlash. The case reveals that there is a dark side to ripeness: the conditions that lead to a mutually hurting stalemate can also lead to public outrage, elite divisions, and opposition to negotiations. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Negotiation Vol. 25, No. 3; 2020: p.463–494 |
| Journal Source | International Negotiation Vol: 25 No 3 |
| Key Words | Terrorism ; Egypt ; Negotiations ; Ripeness ; Disengagement ; Islamist Actors |