| ID | 173753 |
| Title Proper | Decoding Morris Janowitz |
| Other Title Information | limited war and pragmatic doctrine |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Travis, Donald S |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The American sociologist Morris Janowitz presented two world views of security named “absolutist” and “pragmatist.” This dualistic paradigm endures into the 21st century and explains how complex and contentious security options are debated within the U.S. security establishment. His paradigm also reveals a condition called the “hegemon trap,” which means that the more powerful militarily that a state becomes relative to other states, the less likely it will fight a large-scale conventional war, resulting in frequent and perpetual limited, low-intensity, and unconventional wars. Based on experiences learned since the Vietnam War, the United States can improve global security by balancing resources between absolutist and pragmatist outlooks. This requires devoting a greater share of resources toward peacetime engagement, stability operations, and unconventional warfare. |
| `In' analytical Note | Armed Forces and Society Vol. 46, No.1; Jan 2020: p.68–91 |
| Journal Source | Armed Forces and Society Vol: 46 No 1 |
| Key Words | Pragmatism ; Stability Operations ; Civil – Military Relations ; US Government and Politics |