Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:739Hits:19972437Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID173953
Title ProperShelved sovereignty or invalid sovereignty? the South China Sea negotiations, 1992–2016
LanguageENG
AuthorDruckman, Daniel ;  Kim, Jiye
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article contributes to the current discourses on China’s diplomacy in the South China Sea disputes by asking: What does China want to achieve in the various negotiations? By comparing different versions of the multilateral Code of Conduct negotiations between 1992 and 2016, the authors find that the sovereignty issue has been shelved throughout the negotiations. We identify three factors that may account for this finding: the inconsistency of China’s official claims over time, China’s increased bargaining power, and the importance of the shelved sovereignty axiom since the era of Deng Xiaoping. The authors conclude that the normative game continues in the shadows of international norms represented by invalid sovereignty over the contested waters.
`In' analytical NotePacific Review Vol. 33, No.1; Jan 2020: p.32-60
Journal SourcePacific Review Vol: 33 No 1
Key WordsSovereignty ;  China ;  Negotiation ;  South China Sea Disputes


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text