| ID | 174000 |
| Title Proper | Populists, Producers and the Politics of Rentiership |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jäger, Anton |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Populism studies finds itself in a crisis of originality. While some scholars have signalled over‐usage, others have argued that by contextualising populism, we are able to specify our own ‘populist moment’ and remedy the term’s slipperiness. This article opts for the latter tactic through a comparison of two aspects of contemporary populism with late nineteenth century precedents. In the late nineteenth century, the American People’s Party pioneered a mode of mass politics anchored in agrarian and industrial labour which launched the term ‘populism’ in Western discourse. Contemporary populists show rhetorical and political overlap with this template, but also come up against two new constraints: (1) a stagnant capitalism increasingly centred on ‘rentiership’; and (2) a disorganised civil society. These factors render today’s populism resistant to analogy but also conceptually more specific, sharpening the contours of our populist moment. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 91, No.2; Apr-Jun 2020: p.343-350 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2020-06 91, 2 |
| Key Words | Democracy ; Technocracy ; Populism ; Party ; Rentiership ; Producerism ; Disorganisation |