Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:381Hits:20493726Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID174050
Title ProperHow and When are We Right to Prioritize the Interests of Residents and Citizens?
LanguageENG
AuthorBeltrán, Enrique Camacho
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article assesses an assumption pervasive in one strain of arguments in favor of stringent immigration controls. The assumption affirms that—for the case of regular admissions—to a certain extent states are permitted to prioritize the interests of their citizens and residents by issuing exclusionary immigration policies (call this the priority assumption). Using the normative methodology of applied international ethics, I suggest some broad constraints to this priority assumption that have a bearing on justifications for current practical immigration policy in Europe, North America, and beyond. I do so by redefining borders as domestic-international institutions that open up borders not only to (internal) standards of justice but also to standards of international legitimacy.
`In' analytical NoteWorld Affairs US Vol. 183, No.1; Spring 2020: p.8-39
Journal SourceWorld Affairs US Vol: 183 No 1
Key WordsImmigration Policy ;  International Relations ;  Border Controls ;  Applied International Ethics ;  Exclusionary Immigration Laws ;  Liberal Political Theory Justice in Immigration


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text