Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:766Hits:19981862Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID174075
Title ProperReconsidering lock-in effects and benefits from delegation
Other Title Informationthe African Union’s relations with its member states through a principal–agent perspective
LanguageENG
AuthorWelz, Martin
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper explores the relations of the African Union (AU) with its member states through the lens of principal–agent theory. I consider the AU Commission—an international public administration—as an agent to which its member states—the principals—delegate authority. I show that core assumptions of principal–agent theory apply to the AU’s relations with its member states. These include that principals aim to keep control over their agent, that we find agents acting opportunistically, that principals sanction the agent if needed and that the heterogeneity of preferences amongst principals decreases the level of authority delegated to the agent. However, my analysis also suggests that principal–agent theory needs to broaden its understandings of lock-in effects and of the reasons why states limit their delegation of authority.
`In' analytical NoteCambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 33, No.2; Apr 2020: p.159-178
Journal SourceCambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 33 No 2
Key WordsAfrican Union’s Relations ;  Principal–agent Perspective


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text