Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:374Hits:19892347Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID174561
Title ProperOvercoming the division bloc and its limitations: a Gramscian approach to South Korean social formation
LanguageENG
AuthorChoi, Yong Sub
Summary / Abstract (Note)Colonialism affects post-colonial social formations in a variety of ways. Japanese colonial rule had a far-reaching influence on South Korean post-colonial social formation. Most legacies of colonialism diminished as time went by, but one legacy of colonialism continued or even increased its effects on the South Korean political economy from the 1960s – namely, the division of Korea. This article provides an alternative Gramscian approach to the analysis of the social formation of South Korea, with due consideration of the division of the peninsula. For that purpose, it introduces the concept of a division bloc, adapting Gramsci’s concept of a historical bloc to develop an analysis of a social formation that is unique to South Korea. Then, I explicate the two events that have been most damaging for the division bloc – the 1997 economic crisis and the 1998–2007 inter-Korean reconciliation – describing them as an organic crisis and a hegemonic project, respectively. Following this, I present reasons why the counter-hegemonic efforts of liberal nationalists to overcome the division bloc failed.
`In' analytical NoteThird World Quarterly Vol. 41, No.10; 2020: p.1707-1722
Journal SourceThird World Quarterly Vol: 41 No 10
Key WordsGramsci ;  Hegemonic Project ;  Historical Bloc ;  Division Bloc ;  Organic Crisis ;  Interregnum


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text