| ID | 174691 |
| Title Proper | Parliamentary Prorogation in Comparative Context |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schleiter, Petra ; Petra Schleiter Thomas G. Fleming ; Fleming, Thomas G |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper examines the power to prorogue (or suspend) Parliament following the 2019 prorogation controversy in the UK. We outline the legal basis of prerogative‐based prorogation, survey its uses in the UK and other Westminster systems, and compare it with equivalent rules in other European parliamentary democracies. The comparative perspective highlights the outlier status of the UK among comparable European democracies. In the UK, the absence of explicit legal limits on the use of prorogation gives the executive exceptional scope to employ the power for political purposes to sidestep Parliament. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for current discussions about the desirability of reforming the UK’s prorogation rules and placing express legal limits on the executive’s power. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 91, No.3; Jul-Sep 2020: p.641-648 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2020-09 91, 3 |
| Key Words | Comparative Context ; Parliamentary Prorogation |