| ID | 175157 |
| Title Proper | Eclecticism or exclusivity? the (critical) pragmatist ethos of (intersectional) analytic eclecticism |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Peet, Jessica |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Eclecticism in International Relations (IR) claims to reject the rigid boundaries set by various theoretical traditions, yet, in practice, it falls short of moving the field “beyond paradigms” and tends to produce analytical exclusivity rather than eclecticism. This exclusivity is the result of Sil and Katzenstein’s investment in tenets of American pragmatism. These tenets favor consensus and universalism, leading to the reproduction and exclusivity of the theoretical status quo. Dissolving paradigmatic boundaries requires a more critical form of pragmatism. Drawing on the common origins of feminism and pragmatism paired with the contemporary feminist concept of intersectionality, this essay proposes a critical pragmatist ethos and an intersectional analytic eclecticism. This can produce a more inclusive form of analytic eclecticism and render visible the power dynamics that shape experiences as well as academic scholarship. Only when analytic eclecticism is informed by intersectionality and a critical pragmatism might it actually move IR “beyond paradigms.” |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal Vol. 75, No.3; Sep 2020: p.420-432 |
| Journal Source | International Journal Vol: 75 No 3 |
| Key Words | Pragmatism ; Feminism ; International Relation Theory ; Intersectionality ; Analytic Eclecticism ; Disciplinary Sociology |