Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1292Hits:19775211Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID175336
Title ProperPolitical Trust, Shocks, and Accountability
Other Title InformationQuasi-experimental Evidence from a Rebel Attack
LanguageENG
AuthorGates, Scott ;  Justesen, Mogens K
Summary / Abstract (Note)How does armed conflict affect accountability and political trust in democratic governments? To answer this question, we present quasi-experimental evidence based on survey data which, coincidentally, were collected in the days surrounding an unanticipated violent attack by a rebel group in Mali. The chance occurrence of the attack five days into the survey demarcates respondents into two groups surveyed before and after the attack and allows us to examine how the attack affected approval of politicians and trust in political institutions. Our results show that people mainly attribute responsibility to the president and not to parliament or local government, while trust in institutions is largely unaffected. We also show that these effects are strongest in the region of the attack. These findings suggest that voters in new democracies are capable of attributing responsibility to individual politicians and governments while maintaining trust in the fundamental political institutions of democracy.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 64, No.9; Oct 2020: p.1693-1723
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 64 No 9
Key WordsConflict ;  Public Opinion ;  Insurgency ;  Civil Wars ;  Africa ;  Domestic Politics ;  Democratic Institutions ;  Quasi Experiment


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text