Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:340Hits:19956131Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID175479
Title ProperGoverning (through) trustworthiness
Other Title Informationtechnologies of power and subjectification in China’s social credit system
LanguageENG
AuthorZhang, Chenchen
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines the technologies of power and subjectification in China’s social credit system through a theoretically informed analysis of policy and legal documents as well as the narratives of social credit practitioners, including local officials and representatives of business partners. The ongoing project is a heterogeneous ensemble of discourses, regulations, policies, and any number of programs aiming to govern social and economic activities through problematizing, assessing, and utilizing the “trustworthiness” of individuals, enterprises, organizations, and government agencies. Drawing on governmentality studies, the article explicates the operation of governmental and disciplinary-pastoral modalities of power in the project, which are interrelated in their logics and overlap in the tactics employed. Whereas the strategy of governmental/biopolitical power is centered on achieving effective economic governance and improving regulatory compliance through technological fixes, disciplinary-pastoral power aspires to shape individual behavior and the collective mores of a locality according to a mixture of market-oriented and socialist-traditional values. Social credit is envisioned to produce and channel homo economicus and homo moralis. However, the relationships between liberal and socialist subjectivities and between rationalization and moralization are by no means coherent. The assemblage of social credit government is characterized by contradictions and contestations.
`In' analytical NoteCritical Asian Studies Vol. 52, No.4; Dec 2020: p.565-588
Journal SourceCritical Asian Studies 2020-12 52, 4
Key WordsChina ;  Governmentality ;  Social Credit System ;  Data-Driven Governance