| ID | 175512 |
| Title Proper | Cruising for a Bruising |
| Other Title Information | Maritime Competition in an Anti-Access Age |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dombrowski, Peter ; Caverley, Jonathan D |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper explores the likelihood of maritime crisis stability between China and the United States by building on existing research on the Sino-American naval balance and the concepts of offense–defense theory. Whereas a “denialist” school in security studies argues that counterintervention technology makes defense dominant in the region, the US Navy remains a fleet designed for an offensive approach of power projection and sea control. Although this stubbornness in the face of a sophisticated anti-access capability might be attributable to a strong operational culture and obvious bureaucratic incentives, we posit additional forces suggesting defense dominance will not lead to crisis stability. At sea, offense–defense distinguishability is low and the temptation to strike first is high. Future interaction between current US and Chinese fleet designs risks a crisis or even war that will endanger the US fleet, potentially leading to the loss of the very military advantages underpinning American hegemony that its navy seeks to defend. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 29, No.4; Aug-Sep 2020: p.671-700 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 29 No 4 |
| Key Words | China and the United States ; Maritime Competition ; Anti-Access Age ; Maritime Crisis Stability |