| ID | 175592 |
| Title Proper | Candidate Selection Reform in South Korea |
| Other Title Information | the Persistence of Exclusive Practices Despite Inclusive Rules |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Woo, Eun Hee |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper analyzes how democratization has affected the dynamics of candidate selection in South Korea. After democratization in the late 1980s, it was expected that intra-party democracy would follow. In response to increasing public demand, the major parties adopted primary systems in the early 2000s. Nonetheless, most candidates for the legislature are still nominated by a small number of central party elites without additional ballots in the local branches. To explain the persistence of the exclusive, centralized features of candidate selection, I highlight the limited impact democratization has had on the political environment in which parties operate. More specifically, since democratization ended in a compromise among a small number of party leaders, South Korea retained much of the political legacy from authoritarian times, such an electoral system advantageous to the major parties and legal provisions restricting electoral campaigns, party activities, and political participation. The continuation of these political institutions makes radical candidate selection reform highly unlikely as the party elites have no incentive to expand and decentralize the selection process. Without significant changes to the political institutions at the national level, the dominance of the central party elite over the final outcome of candidate selection looks likely to continue for the foreseeable future. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Affairs Vol. 93, No.4; Dec 2020: p.735-758 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Affairs Vol: 93 No 4 |
| Key Words | Institutionalism ; South Korea ; Democratization ; Party Organization ; Candidate Selection |