| ID | 175630 |
| Title Proper | Zero option and NATO’s dual-track decision |
| Other Title Information | rethinking the paradox |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lutsch, Andreas |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | An insufficiently understood paradox surrounded the NATO dual-track decision. This paradox was at the core of an almost classical high impact-low probability scenario which became reality with the INF Treaty of 1987, bringing NATO closer to a crisis of to be or not to be. NATO governments (except France) formally decided in 1979 that new long-range missiles in Europe were necessary but lacked political willpower to exclude the zero option, the possibility that NATO’s missile deployments may be obviated through arms control. The article analyses why this was the case, clarifies why this mattered, and draws policy implications from this crucial episode. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 43, No.6-7; Dec 2020: p.957-989 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 43 No 6-7 |
| Key Words | INF Treaty ; Denuclearisation ; Extended Nuclear Deterrence ; Dual-Track Decision ; NAT ; Zero Option |