Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:872Hits:19984990Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID175737
Title ProperRestricting Opposition in Elections and Terrorist Violence
LanguageENG
AuthorBraithwaite, Alex ;  Braithwaite, Jessica Maves
Summary / Abstract (Note)We offer a novel argument to explain how the use of terrorist violence is affected by the restrictions that governments place on opposition participation in elections. Opposition actors often decide whether and how to participate in elections. Governments influence these decisions by controlling who can contest elections and, by doing so, they influence the access to public support that opponents stand to gain from participating or fighting. “Unrestricted” elections, without limits on who can participate in opposition to the government, represent an opportunity for moderation in politics. This moderation threatens the raison d’être of violent extremists. Accordingly, extremists are likely to look to use violence to spoil unrestricted elections. “Restricted” elections, where some opponents are excluded from participating, undermine public support to the opposition as a whole, thereby reducing the likelihood that they are able to resort to terrorism. Importantly, these effects are anticipated to be most prevalent in non-democracies, where norms of moderation in politics are yet to be fully developed. A series of negative binomial regression models provide support for these dual logics.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 32, No.5-8; Jul-Dec 2020: p.1550-1572
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 32 No 5-8
Key WordsTerrorism ;  Political Violence ;  Elections ;  Electoral Restrictions


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text