Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:383Hits:19948402Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID176043
Title ProperIs the NPT unraveling? evidence from text analysis of review conference statements
LanguageENG
AuthorLo, James ;  Barnum, Miriam ;  James Lo
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) is a landmark international treaty that is widely regarded as a cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. However, pessimists point to a growing divergence of preferences between nuclear weapons states and non-nuclear weapons states as a precursor to the impending ‘unraveling of this vital piece of international law’. In this article, we test for evidence of preference divergence using statements from NPT review conferences, which are manifestos presenting each country’s position on the NPT. We measure preferences on the NPT using Wordfish, a method that is frequently used to estimate ideological preferences from election manifestos. Our measure estimates the latent positions of state actors along a ‘non-proliferation vs. disarmament’ dimension, and shows little evidence of growing preference divergence between the nuclear weapons states and non-nuclear weapons states. Thus, a significant premise underlying more pessimistic assessments of the NPT appears to be in doubt.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol. 57, No.6; Nov 2020: p.740-751
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol: 57 No 6
Key WordsNuclear Weapons ;  Nonproliferation Treaty ;  Latent Variable Estimation ;  Text-As-Data


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text