Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:389Hits:20371359Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID176095
Title ProperConflict Aggravation or Alleviation? A Cross‐National Examination of U.S. Military Aid's Effect on Conflict Dynamics with Insights from Pakistan
LanguageENG
AuthorJadoon, Amira
Summary / Abstract (Note)MILITARY AID RELATIONSHIPS ALLOW DONORS to avoid direct intervention and delegate the practical execution of their security goals to recipients. But recipients often fall short of meeting the security objectives that underpin military aid. Pakistan, which has received large amounts of military aid from the United States since September 11, 2001, has been consistently criticized by U.S. administrations for failing to do enough to dismantle terrorist networks. In 2018, the Donald Trump administration finally announced its decision to halt all security aid to Pakistan for playing a duplicitous role and providing sanctuaries to terrorists.1
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science Quarterly Vol. 135, No.4; Winter 2020-21 : p.665-695
Journal SourcePolitical Science Quarterly Vol: 135 No 4
Key WordsConflict Dynamics ;  Conflict Aggravation ;  Cross‐National Examination of U.S. Military Aid's ;  Insights from Pakistan


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text