Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:567Hits:20582571Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID177519
Title ProperFindings of the Hariri Tribunal
LanguageENG
AuthorSalt, Jeremy ;  Hariri Tribunal ;  UN Tribunal ;  Special Tribunal for Lebanon
Summary / Abstract (Note)The author analyzes the final judgment of the UN tribunal convened to inquire into the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. Only one of the four men originally charged was found guilty, wholly on the basis of alleged cell-phone communications. Although Israel was known to have comprehensively penetrated the Lebanese telecommunications sector, the tribunal made no attempt to prove conclusively that the cell-phone calls allegedly made by the accused were actually made by them and not fabricated by a third party. This significant omission undermines the authenticity of the evidence. The tribunal also failed to consider the possible involvement of two governments that have a long history of subversion and violence in Lebanon, the United States and Israel, both totally hostile to Hezbollah and the Syrian government. All of these elements combined raise serious questions about the course of the tribunal's findings from the beginning.
`In' analytical NoteMiddle East Policy Vol. 27, No.4; Winter 2020: p.136-142
Journal SourceMiddle East Policy Vol: 27 No 4
Key WordsHariri Tribunal ;  UN Tribunal ;  Special Tribunal for Lebanon


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text