| ID | 177755 |
| Title Proper | Fragile public preference for cyber strikes |
| Other Title Information | evidence from survey experiments in the United States, United Kingdom, and Israel |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gross, Michael L ; Canetti, Daphna ; Shandler, Ryan |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | To what extent does the public support the use of cyber weapons? We propose that public exposure to the destructive potential of cyber-attacks will dispel the clear cross-national preference for cyber strikes. To test this, we conducted two survey experiments (n = 2,585) that examine support for cyber versus conventional military strikes in the United States, United Kingdom, and Israel. In study 1, we exposed respondents to television news reports depicting various forms of terror attacks, and then measured the subsequent support for retaliatory options. Findings indicate that the high public support for deploying cyber weapons dissipated entirely among respondents exposed to lethal cyber-attacks. In study 2, we probed this vanishing support, finding that exposure to destructive cyber-attacks undercuts the perception of cyber as a less lethal domain, therefore diminishing its appeal. We conclude by discussing how the fragile public preference for cyber weapons encourages military escalation in the short-term. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 42, No.2; Apr 2021: p.135-162 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol: 42 No 2 |
| Key Words | Terrorism ; Public Opinion ; Cyber Warfare ; Foreign Policy ; Cyber - Attacks ; Cyber Escalation |