| ID | 177846 |
| Title Proper | Dark Side of Institutional Collaboration |
| Other Title Information | How Peacekeeping-counterterrorism Convergences Weaken the Protection of Civilians in Mali |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Moe, Louise Wiuff |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Within the field of international peace and security, policy makers and analysts alike commonly treat collaboration and convergence among international organizations and intervention frameworks as a policy objective in itself. Indeed, from the focus on the ‘comprehensive approach’, during the 2000s, to the recent emphasis on multi-dimensional and integrated stabilization frameworks, institutional collaboration is cast as inherently positive and desirable in regard to addressing international collective matters. This article challenges such ‘collaboration bias’. It does so by exploring the empirical effects of increasing collaboration and ‘strategic partnerships’ within the context of the current (re)turn to stabilization interventions. Specifically, focusing on Mali, it unpacks how contemporary stabilization efforts intensify collaboration across counterterrorism and peacekeeping interventions in ways that undercut policy implementation within one of the most central peacekeeping priority areas, namely the Protection of Civilians (PoC). In detailing key aspects on which contemporary peacekeeping-counterterrorism entanglements compromise protection efforts, the article conveys some of the ‘dark sides’ of cooperation regimes. It moreover highlights the need to not only explore regime complexity as a systemic feature of world politics but also unpack how it operates, and to what effect, at the meso and micro levels of policy implementation and practice. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Peacekeeping Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2021: p.1-29 |
| Journal Source | International Peacekeeping Vol: 28 No 1 |
| Key Words | Peacekeeping ; Counterterrorism ; Protection of Civilians ; Stabilization ; Regime Complexity |