| ID | 178199 |
| Title Proper | Role of history in the formulation of Canadian foreign policy statements |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Michaud, Nelson ; Tremblay, Stephane ; Mayer, Frederic |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Foreign policy statements—and, namely, white papers—offer diplomats, civil servants, and the general public, as well as international actors (friends and foes alike) an understanding of what motivates a country to engage in international issues. They are fundamental government declarations intended to direct the policy process toward its political and operational objectives. Is history embedded in the message these statements carry? And, if so, how is history used? Relying on Brands and Suri’s typology and framing categories (factual/normative), this article explores white papers issued by governments led by Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin Jr., as well as the 2017 House of Commons statement by Justin Trudeau’s foreign affairs minister, Chrystia Freeland. Based on Canada’s tradition of Pearsonian internationalism, we hypothesize that the factual use of history would prevail. We find this to be the case, but with important nuances. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal Vol. 75, No.4; Dec 2020: p.576–593 |
| Journal Source | International Journal Vol: 75 No 4 |
| Key Words | Canada ; Framing ; White Paper ; History ; Foreign Policy ; Pierre Elliott Trudeau ; Justin Trudeau ; Jean Chretien ; Paul Martin Jr. ; Lloyd Axworthy |