| ID | 178357 |
| Title Proper | Broadening the perspective on military cohesion? a reply |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | King, Anthony |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In 2018, Ilmari Käihkö published a special collection in Armed Forces & Society on the debate about small unit cohesion. Later, in reaction to a response by Guy Siebold, he published a further intervention with Peter Haldén. Focusing on my 2006 article in the journal and my subsequent debate, Käihkö has claimed that the cohesion debate is too narrow. It ignores organizational factors in the armed forces and wider political factors, including nationalism and state policy. Consequently, it is incapable of analyzing non-Western state or irregular forces and is only relevant for the 20th and 21st centuries. This response shows that while Käihkö’s extension of the empirical archive to non-Western armed groups is to be welcomed, none of his theoretical claims are sustainable. |
| `In' analytical Note | Armed Forces and Society Vol. 47, No.3; Jul 2021: p.586–595 |
| Journal Source | Armed Forces and Society Vol: 47 No 3 |
| Key Words | Cohesion ; Combat Effectiveness ; Small Units ; Eurocentricism |