| ID | 178557 |
| Title Proper | concept of ‘hybrid warfare’ undermines NATO’s strategic thinking |
| Other Title Information | insights from interviews with NATO officials |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Caliskan, Murat ; Liégeois, Michel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Hybrid warfare has been a popular term that refers to contemporary warfare. Despite the increasing number of critiques, NATO has used the term in its strategic documents and summit declarations. Since concepts are important in shaping our understanding and the way that our forces fight, NATO’s use of a controversial concept has raised some questions. In this context, this paper aims to explore the meaning of the hybrid warfare from the viewpoint of NATO, based on in-depth interviews with NATO officials who have sufficient expertise and experience about the concept. The authors conclude that hybrid warfare is an ambiguous concept which clouds NATO’s strategic thinking and leads NATO to forget the difference between war and peace. Further analysis has revealed that NATO uses this concept as a tool for the strategic communication rather than a military concept. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 32, No.2; Mar 2021: p.295-319 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol: 32 No 2 |
| Key Words | NATO ; Warfare ; Political Warfare ; Hybrid Threats ; Hybrid Warfare ; Strategy ; Military Concept ; Character of Warfare |