Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1504Hits:19767625Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID178558
Title ProperLost in transition
Other Title Informationthe myth of Mao and the origins of COIN
LanguageENG
AuthorZambernardi, Lorenzo ;  Dossi, Simone ;  Castelli, Emanuele
Summary / Abstract (Note)Mao’s military teachings have greatly affected the development of modern counterinsurgency. Although the influence of Mao’s doctrine on modern counterinsurgency has been examined, scholarship has failed to highlight that the reception of Mao’s writings and deeds is based on a misreading of his theory and strategy. In the transition from Maoist people’s war to COIN, two aspects of the former were lost. Firstly, for Mao the use of force remained the decisive instrument in war. Secondly, whereas for COIN the security of the population is a crucial goal, for Mao the population was a mere instrument that could be sacrificed if the conditions of the conflict so required.
`In' analytical NoteSmall Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 32, No.2; Mar 2021: p.320-343
Journal SourceSmall Wars and Insurgencies Vol: 32 No 2
Key WordsInsurgency ;  COIN ;  Mao ;  People’s War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text