| ID | 179003 |
| Title Proper | Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and Coherent Aggregation |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Roy, Olivier ; RAD, SOROUSH RAFIEE |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Rational deliberation helps to avoid cyclic or intransitive group preferences by fostering meta-agreements, which in turn ensures single-peaked profiles. This is the received view, but this paper argues that it should be qualified. On one hand we provide evidence from computational simulations that rational deliberation tends to increase proximity to so-called single-plateaued preferences. This evidence is important to the extent that, as we argue, the idea that rational deliberation fosters the creation of meta-agreement and, in turn, single-peaked profiles does not carry over to single-plateaued ones, and the latter but not the former makes coherent aggregation possible when the participants are allowed to express indifference between options. On the other hand, however, our computational results show, against the received view, that when the participants are strongly biased towards their own opinions, rational deliberation tends to create irrational group preferences, instead of eliminating them. These results are independent of whether the participants reach meta-agreements in the process, and as such they highlight the importance of rational preference change and biases towards one’s own opinion in understanding the effects of rational deliberation. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 115, No.2; May 2021: p.629 - 648 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review 2021-06 115, 2 |
| Key Words | Deliberation ; Single-Peakedness ; Coherent Aggregation |