| ID | 179163 |
| Title Proper | Redefining the Debate Over Reputation and Credibility in International Security |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jervis, Robert ; Yarhi-Milo, Keren ; Casler, Don |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | A wave of recent scholarship has breathed new life into the study of reputation and credibility in international politics. In this review article, the authors welcome this development while offering a framework for evaluating collective progress, a series of related critiques, and a set of suggestions for future research. The article details how the books under review represent an important step toward consensus on the importance of reputation in world politics, elucidating scope conditions for when reputational inferences are likely to be most salient. The authors argue that despite the significant accomplishments of recent studies, the scholarly record remains thin on the psychology of the perceiver and is instead focused on situational factors at the expense of dispositional variables and is rather myopically oriented toward reputation for resolve to the exclusion of other important types. Despite its contributions, the new literature still falls short of a full explanation for how actors draw inferences about reputation. These remaining theoretical challenges demand scholarly attention and suggest a role for psychology in filling some of the gaps.
|
| `In' analytical Note | World Politics Vol. 73, No.1; Jan 2021: p.167 - 203 |
| Journal Source | World Politics Vol: 73 No 1 |
| Key Words | Leaders ; Psychology ; Perception ; Reputation ; Signaling ; Credibility ; Foreign Policy |