Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:473Hits:20448396Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID179196
Title ProperWarriors Who Don’t Fight
Other Title Informationthe Post–Cold War United States Army and Debates over Peacekeeping Operations
LanguageENG
AuthorFitzgerald, David
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines post-Cold War debates over the U.S. Army’s participation in peacekeeping operations. Peacekeeping meant different things to policy-makers, army leaders, public intellectuals, and those who served on such missions. Army leaders were generally not enthusiastic about these operations but recognized they were indicative of future trends. Peacekeepers accepted the role, even if they struggled to understand how to navigate the gray zone between peace and war; political commentators sought to use peacekeeping missions to advance their own causes. Participants in these debates articulated not only their thoughts on peacekeeping, but radically different visions of what they wanted the American soldier of the 21st century to be.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Military History Vol. 85, No.1; Jan 2021: p.163–90
Journal SourceJournal of Military History 2021-03 85, 1
Key WordsPeacekeeping Operations ;  United States Army ;  Post–Cold War