Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:867Hits:20293258Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID179269
Title ProperFake Spies, Democratization, and Transitional Justice in South Korea
Other Title InformationRetrial Acquittals following Fabricated Espionage Charges
LanguageENG
AuthorHong, Ji Yeon ;  Sunkyoung Park; Ji Yeon Hong ;  Park, Sunkyoung
Summary / Abstract (Note)Many democracies start with aspirations to rectify wrongs that occurred under the preceding authoritarian regime. To what extent can a new democracy address political repression and violence by dictators, given that key actors from the past often remain politically powerful? What determines the success of those efforts? We construct and analyze a novel data set on 102 retrials of allegedly fabricated espionage cases in South Korea to explain the political conditions under which a democratic judiciary reverses past errors. We find that the time since democratization, a leader’s policy drive for transitional justice, and the degree of fabrication in the past all affect retrial acquittal rates. We also find that judges who were appointed under the authoritarian regime are less likely to nullify past verdicts. Furthermore, national survey analysis suggests that the overturning of past fabricated verdicts significantly enhances citizens’ overall trust in the judiciary.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Survey Vol. 61, No.2; Mar-Apr 2021: p.356–386
Journal SourceAsian Survey Vol: 61 No 2
Key WordsSouth Korea ;  Transitional Justice ;  Judicial Trust ;  Fabricated Espionage Charges ;  Retrial


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text