| ID | 179279 |
| Title Proper | Regulation of private military and security companies |
| Other Title Information | analyzing power in multi-stakeholder initiatives |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Prem, Berenike |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article studies the limitations of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) relating to Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs). It draws attention to three distinct ways in which power operates in and around MSIs: rules, structural positions, and discourses. Based on an analysis of two MSIs, it shows that these governance initiatives strengthen the perspectives of stakeholders that consider PMSCs as normal and legitimate security actors. Western governments and like-minded actors have used the Swiss Initiative and the International Code of Conduct for Security Service Providers to bypass the less privatization-friendly process in the United Nations. MSIs equally perform an important legitimizing function for PMSCs through their discourses and practices. Finally, participants of the MSIs have relegated critical voices, weakening their ability to partake in governing the PMSC industry. By studying the limitations of MSIs through a power-analytical lens, this article therefore points at an important but overlooked dimension. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 42, No.3; Jul 2021: p.345-370 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol: 42 No 3 |
| Key Words | Power ; Transnational Governance ; Private Military and Security Companies ; Multi-stakeholder Initiatives |