Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:374Hits:20212638Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID179553
Title ProperPerceptions of Peace Agreements and Political Trust in Post-War Guatemala, Nepal, and Northern Ireland
LanguageENG
AuthorBakke, Kristin M ;  Dyrstad, Karin ;  Binningsbø, Helga M
Summary / Abstract (Note)(Re)gaining citizens’ trust is a challenge for post-war governments. Political trust is crucial for understanding both the risk of civil war in the first place and the state-society relationships that emerge afterwards. Peace agreements are tools to stop the fighting, address war’s injustices, and provide a blueprint for the state’s future – and they do so to varying degrees. Yet we have little systematic knowledge of how people react to such agreements and with what consequences. We argue that in post-war societies, people’s perceptions of the strategies aimed at ending the violence and (re)building the state have an enduring impact on people’s view of the state. In this study, we examine the association between post-conflict political trust and people’s approval of peace agreements analyzing a set of nationally representative, comparative surveys from Guatemala, Nepal, and Northern Ireland, three cases where long civil wars were ended by peace agreements. We find that individuals’ approval of the agreement and the perception that it has been implemented are positively associated with political trust, and that accounting for views of the peace agreement substantially improve on conventional explanations for political trust.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Peacekeeping Vol. 28, No.4; Aug 2021: p.606-631
Journal SourceInternational Peacekeeping Vol: 28 No 4
Key WordsPublic Opinion ;  Northern Ireland ;  Nepal ;  Guatemala ;  Peace Agreement ;  Post-conflict ;  Political Trust


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text