Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:755Hits:19997049Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID179928
Title ProperInfluence through Absence in U.S. Counterinsurgency Interventions? Coercing Local Allies through Threats to Withdraw
LanguageENG
AuthorWeisiger, Alex ;  Elias, Barbara
Summary / Abstract (Note)In counterinsurgency, U.S. officials often feel trapped by a localally who appears unable to survive the departure of U.S. forces. Advocates for withdrawal argue that only a deadline to depart will induce local governments to accept greater burdens, while critics of this position argue that plans to withdraw embolden insurgents. We argue instead that American leaders gain leverage from U.S. public opinion favouring withdrawal. Analysis of 200+ U.S. demands of local allied governments in Vietnam and Iraq suggests that public pressure for withdrawal is associated with greater local compliance, but that formal U.S. withdrawal plans does not motivate compliance.
`In' analytical NoteCivil Wars Vol. 22, No.4; Dec 2020: p.512-542
Journal SourceCivil Wars Vol: 22 No 4
Key WordsU.S. Forces ;  U.S. Counterinsurgency ;  Threats to Withdraw


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text