| ID | 180349 |
| Title Proper | Framing, truth-telling, and the limits of local transitional justice |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kochanski, Adam |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Transitional justice (TJ) is undergoing a legitimacy crisis. While recent critical TJ scholarship has touted the transformative potential of locally rooted mechanisms as a possible means to emancipate TJ, this burgeoning literature rests on shaky assumptions about the purported benefits of local TJ and provides inadequate attention to local-national power dynamics. By taking these factors into consideration, this article contends that local TJ efforts can be used to deflect justice in manners that paradoxically allow ruling parties to avoid human rights accountability and to conceal the truth about wartime violations. It further argues that the principal method by which justice is subverted is not through overt manipulation by abusive governments, but rather, through subtle and indirect ‘distortional framing’ practices, which ruling parties use to set discursive limits around discussions of conflict-related events and to obfuscate their own serious crimes. After developing this argument theoretically, the case study of Cambodia is considered in detail to reveal and to trace the processes by which distortional framing has been used as a technique to deflect justice. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 47, No.4; Oct 2021: p. 468 - 488 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 47 No 4 |
| Key Words | Cambodia ; Peacebuilding ; Transitional Justice ; Local Agency ; Truth-Telling ; Discursive Frames |